When Russian President Vladimir Putin was preparing for last month’s nationwide vote on potentially extending his rule until 2036, he let the veil slip on part of the calculation behind the constitutional change.
‘If this doesn’t happen, then in about two years – and I know this from personal experience – the normal rhythm of work of many parts of government will be replaced by a search for a possible successor,’ Putin said in an interview with state TV channel Rossiya.
‘We must be working, not looking for successors.’+11
Former Kremlin adviser Sergei Pugachev, pictured above, said Putin had been grappling with the question of succession since at least 2006
Public discontent over Putin’s rule has begun to spill into the open in Russia’s Far East, where tens of thousands have marched in protest for the past three weekends. Above, Putin pictured during a video conference call dedicated to the opening of new military medical centres for patients infected with Covid-19, in June
The Kremlin won the vote, declaring it a triumph. The constitution now will allow Putin to return to power for another two six-year terms.
Independent monitor Golos, however, reported unprecedented vote fraud, and political opponents say the elaborate maneuvering over the ballot has weakened Putin’s legitimacy.
Public discontent over Putin’s rule has begun to spill into the open in Russia’s Far East, where tens of thousands have marched in protest for the past three weekends.
Beyond Putin’s own comments to state TV, the Kremlin isn’t explaining its calculus about the constitutional change.
But a first-hand account by a former insider of how the Kremlin tried to manage the handover of power in 2008, when Putin first faced a constitutional limit on his presidency, provides a glimpse into the under-the-carpet power struggles of Moscow’s ruling elite and some of the issues the Russian leader must grapple with.
Putin pictured during a board meeting of the Chamber of Commerce and Industry in December 2007.
Russia’s President Vladimir Putin pictured entering the hall with Prime Minister Viktor Zubkov to announce the new cabinet in Moscow in September 2007
Since at least 2006, former Kremlin adviser Sergei Pugachev told Reuters, Putin has been grappling with the question of succession.
Once known as the Kremlin’s banker, Pugachev played a key role in Putin’s rise 20 years ago. His business interests spanned military shipyards, coal and construction, and he sat as a senator in parliament’s upper chamber.
Today he is in deep conflict with his former allies, accused by Russian authorities of bankrupting the bank he co-founded, a charge Pugachev denies. He fled to Britain and then France, where he currently lives, after London’s High Court in 2014 ordered his assets frozen at Russia’s request.
Now, Pugachev has spoken for the first time about Putin’s decision-making in the run-up to 2008. He told how the president was often hostage to the will of his inner circle of former KGB men and associates from his hometown of St Petersburg.
The question of handing over power has always been the ‘biggest headache’ of Putin’s rule, Pugachev told Reuters.
For Putin, the succession ‘was always a serious, personal stress. He never intended to hand over control of the country to anyone.’ Putin saw himself running Russia behind the scenes as the father of the nation, said Pugachev, but finding a successor who would go along with this plan ‘was always a big problem.’
Pugachev has spoken for the first time about Putin’s decision-making in the run-up to 2008. Above, Pugachev pictured shaking hands with Putin in July 2000
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov declined to comment about Pugachev’s account of events.
In 2007, Pugachev was still a consummate Kremlin insider, close to many of the powerful men around Putin, the so-called siloviki, mostly drawn from Russia’s security services.
He says he was in the room when several key decisions were made. Photos and other documentary materials reviewed by Reuters show Pugachev held a position near the pinnacle of Kremlin power right up to 2008, and support some elements of his account.
The photos show Pugachev’s teenage sons hanging out with Putin’s daughters at his dacha. Other pictures show Pugachev dining at his dacha in 2005 with the leading security men around Putin.
These included Nikolai Patrushev, then the head of the Federal Security Service, or FSB, successor to the KGB; and Igor Sechin, one of Putin’s KGB allies from St Petersburg, who at the time of the photo was deputy head of the Kremlin administration.
The first time Putin considered changing laws to prolong his rule was in the second term of his presidency, Pugachev said.
By the summer of 2007, Sergei Ivanov, Putin’s first deputy prime minister and the youngest ever general in Russia’s foreign intelligence service, was widely considered the frontrunner to become president the following year, ahead of another Putin ally, Dmitry Medvedev.
The constitution dictated that Putin should step down in 2008 upon expiry of his second consecutive term.
Members of Putin’s inner circle feared that if Ivanov got the top job, he would cut them out of power. They began briefing Putin against Ivanov, said Pugachev. ‘They began telling Putin that Ivanov is very dangerous. He is very aggressive. He will take power and then you will never be able to get rid of him. They were collecting all kinds of kompromat (compromising information) on Ivanov. Almost everyone was against him.’
Kremlin spokesperson Peskov said Ivanov, now the president’s special representative for nature, ecology and transport, would not be able to comment. Reuters couldn’t reach him directly.
Pugachev too had fallen out with Ivanov, after failing to win a major shipbuilding contract in 2006, when Ivanov was the defence minister. That Ivanov seemed to be a loner only boosted him in Putin’s eyes, according to Pugachev. It meant Ivanov ‘couldn’t coordinate with anyone against Putin.’
Behind the scenes, another option to extend Putin’s hold on power was also under consideration. Pugachev said that, at Putin’s request, Pugachev directed a group of lawyers headed by a co-author of the Russian constitution, Sergei Shakhrai, to look into ways Putin could run for a third term.
The lawyers proposed changing the law through a two-thirds majority vote in parliament. Putin had consistently opposed changing the constitution but, said Pugachev, he wanted ‘a second option just in case.’ Shakhrai declined to comment.
Ivanov’s candidacy ended in August 2007, according to Pugachev. Putin had just announced the restoration of long-haul military flights capable of reaching American shores for the first time in 15 years, a move hailed by Russian newspapers as a demonstration of Moscow’s restored military might.
While Putin served as prime minister to Dmitry Medvedev’s president, many within Russia’s elite were confused about who had the final say. Putin pictured with then-President Dmitry Medvedev in June 2011
Six days after Putin’s triumphant announcement, Ivanov said in a television interview the flights did not signify a return to the Cold War. By appearing to speak for the Kremlin, he had overstepped the mark.
‘Sechin brought a tape of Ivanov’s interview to Putin,’ Pugachev said, describing a meeting between Pugachev, Putin and Sechin. Sechin, according to Pugachev, told the president: ‘Look, Vladimir Vladimirovich, you launched the bombers which have not flown for 15 years, since before the Soviet collapse. And Sergei Ivanov, who is no one – he isn’t even the president yet, he isn’t even the successor yet – he has already claimed [the project] as his own.’
‘Sechin played on his ego,’ Pugachev continued. ‘Putin has a thing about going down in history. This was his story, and Ivanov entered his territory…. It was an important psychological moment.’
A spokesman for Sechin declined to comment. Kremlin spokesman Peskov said he could not comment since he was not present.
‘Sechin played on his ego,’ Pugachev continued. ‘Putin has a thing about going down in history. This was his story, and Ivanov entered his territory…. It was an important psychological moment’
Putin wanted a successor who would be president in name only and ready to make way at any moment, Pugachev said. After this incident, added Pugachev, the door was closed to Ivanov.
But time had run out to amend the rules so that Putin could run for a third term. The presidential election was to be announced by the end of 2007, with the vote itself in March 2008. By law, any legal change allowing Putin to remain in power had to happen at least six months prior to an election being called. Putin ‘slept through’ the opportunity for a third term, Pugachev said.
Instead, in September 2007, Putin announced he was appointing as prime minister Viktor Zubkov, a little-known former state farm director who at the time was head of Russia’s anti-money laundering watchdog. The 66-year-old Zubkov was suddenly in the frame to succeed Putin.+11
In September 2007, Putin announced he was appointing as prime minister Viktor Zubkov. Above, Putin and Prime Minister Viktor Zubkov talk before Putin’s departure to Tripoli at Vnukovo II airport in Moscow April 16, 2008
Pugachev said Putin was weighing making Zubkov president for one year, after which Zubkov could say he had fallen ill, and Putin could return.
‘I discussed this with him personally. With Putin and with Zubkov,’ Pugachev said. But Putin rejected the idea. ‘He told me it wouldn’t look very good.’
Reuters couldn’t reach Zubkov. Kremlin spokesman Peskov declined to comment on the matter.
Finally, on December 10, just as the election was about to be declared, Putin announced Dmitry Medvedev, a St Petersburg lawyer who’d long worked in Putin’s shadow, was his favoured candidate to take over as president.
Pugachev said Putin’s circle believed that Medvedev, who’d served as Kremlin chief of staff and most recently alongside Ivanov as a first deputy prime minister, would be the most malleable successor and, importantly, the most willing to make way for Putin should Putin decide to return to the presidency.
Similar views of the Putin-Medvedev partnership were widely reported in Russia at the time.
For the next four years of Medvedev’s presidency, it was as if there were one and a half presidents, Pugachev said. While Putin served as prime minister to Medvedev’s president, many within Russia’s elite were confused about who had the final say.
‘First people ran to Medvedev, and then they ran to Putin. People didn’t understand. If you did something Putin gave you the go ahead to do, the next day Medvedev could reproach you,’ Pugachev said, citing the example of one Russian state bank boss who, when arranging financing, first sought Putin’s approval and then went to Medvedev for his. ‘For people it’s unacceptable when there are two presidents, or one and a half. It’s very important for them to understand who the Tsar is.’
Pugachev said Putin’s circle believed that Medvedev, who’d served as Kremlin chief of staff and most recently alongside Ivanov as a first deputy prime minister, would be the most malleable successor. Above, Putin pictured with Medvedev at the Victory Day parade in Moscow’s Red Square in May 2014
Putin might have been happy to allow Medvedev to serve as president for a second term, but Putin’s inner circle could not contemplate the prospect, Pugachev said, because they feared losing their hold over the economy.
A ‘vicious war’ broke out between factions as Medvedev, in anticipation of running for a second term, began positioning his allies to take over greater chunks of the economy, including Gazprom and Rosneft, the state energy giants long run by Putin’s closest cohort, including Sechin.
The U.S. administration’s open courtship of Medvedev over Putin further exacerbated the rift.
Medvedev’s hopes for a second term were quashed at the very last minute, said Pugachev. By now, Pugachev had already fled Russia, but he said he continued to have in-depth conversations with one of Medvedev’s closest allies about what was happening.
If Putin were to pick a successor, it would be imperative this person be a member of his trusted inner circle, according to Pugachev. Above, Putin during an annual news conference in Moscow in December 2018
According to this account, Medvedev was in the Kremlin putting the finishing touches to his anticipated announcement that he would run for a second term, to be delivered the next day, Sept. 24, 2011, at the annual congress of the ruling United Russia party. In the small hours of the morning, Putin’s security men quietly swapped out the most loyal members of Medvedev’s presidential guard.
The switching of the guards was a threatening sign, according to Pugachev. He recounted that soon afterwards Putin arrived at Medvedev’s Kremlin office and the two men had a friendly chat. Later, Putin announced he was seeking the presidency for himself. ‘In the end it didn’t really matter how much pressure Putin’s security men put on Medvedev [to stand aside]. In the end it was a question of personal contact between Putin and Medvedev,’ said Pugachev.
Kremlin spokesman Peskov said he could not comment on the veracity of Pugachev’s account. He said he only heard of Putin’s plans to return as president when it was publicly announced at the United Russia congress. ‘I worked alongside Putin. But he did not share his plans,’ Peskov said.
Medvedev could not be reached for comment.
A political consultant who’d previously worked for Medvedev, Gleb Pavlovsky, said at the time that it looked like Medvedev had stepped down under pressure. He pointed out that only three months earlier, in an interview with the Financial Times, Medvedev had made clear he would seek a second term as president.
Russian President Vladimir Putin is seen on screen as he delivers his annual state of the nation address to the Federal Assembly in Moscow, January 15, 2020
But while the 2008-2012 experiment with Medvedev’s presidency had revealed to Putin’s circle the risks of a handover of power, Pugachev said he believes Putin might still be considering standing aside again.
The recent constitutional vote may give Putin time to resolve a succession plan behind the scenes, without the pressure of the clock ticking on his final term, Pugachev said.
A sign that Putin may be keeping his options open, Pugachev said, is that a little-noticed change formalises into the constitution a law granting former presidents immunity from prosecution.
If Putin were to pick a successor, it would be imperative this person be a member of his trusted inner circle, Pugachev said. ‘Putin can’t stand outsiders. It’s either his people or no one. It could be his driver or his bodyguard. The successor has to be his.’